CPSnet Web Awards Program, awards for sites skies above.



News

» Speak...
2005-07-08, Awarded "Best Award Graphic" by AFA
We are proud to announce that the HITSASeal was selected as the "Best Award Graphic" by AFA, for the month of July of 2005. To all EUTODA' staff our sincere thanks for this honour! More info about this award is available at our "Honors Granted" section.
2005-06-22, Listed #2 among 31,000 web sites at Silktide SiteScore
With a rating of 9.5 (in 10 possible), the CPSnet Web Awards attained the second position at SiteScore's TOP 750, the best 750 from about 31,000 web sites tested until this date. Silktide SiteScore is a free tool which rates how well designed, popular and accessible a website is. The entire testing process is handled by advanced computer software. SiteScore also gathers user feedback on all the websites rated, to help judge how appealing a design is. SiteScore rates all websites on a scale of 1-10 (10 being the highest). Scores are broken down into 5 categories: Marketing, Design, Accessibility, Experience and User Feedback.
2005-06-07, listed at "Design Snack"
Design Snack is a database of websites rated based on the quality of their design and presentation. Its unique rating scale uses "cookies" and a site can get anywhere from 0-3 cookies, 3 being the highest. The CPSnet Web Awards were rated with "One Cookie" and listed under the "Award Sites" section of the portal.
2005-05-15, rated 6 by EUTODA
We are proud to announce that our program is now one of the few Web awards programs to achieve the prestigious level 6 at EUTODA, the Academy of Fine Awards. To all EUTODA' staff our sincere thanks for this honour!
2005-02-02, recognized as a 5+ Elite Award by Award Sites!
As it states at Award Sites!, "In recognition of owner, Carlos Simões, for his efforts going well beyond his award program in 'bettering the net through excellence!'". Needless to say that we at the CPSnet Web Awards are honoured by this outstanding distinction. Thank You AS! and thank you all the awardmasters and applicants that helped building this program!
2005-01-16, selected the Site Of The Year 2004!
It is that time of the year again, when we at the CPSnet Web Awards select the best site of the previous year. And this time, our panel of invited judges and our permanent review team have selected Tim's Spider Corner as the Best Site Of The Year 2004! Congratulations Tim Beylemans, for your outstanding website! Tim's Spider Corner is an educational site for all spider fans that addresses the conservation of nature. You will find bird eating spider information, as well as an assortment of pictures, handling tips, resource links, a spider knowledge quiz, and the complete anatomy of a bird eating spider.
2005-01-09, awarded the "Humanity Award 2005" by the The Rose Awards:
"We are very proud for being granted this distinction that it is given out to... Webmasters/webmistresses who give back of themselves to the worldwide Net community, offering their talents, their skills, their web sites, as resource points for other people who are interested in bettering themselves and their own sites ... These special people are a great asset to the World Community because they offer their advice and expertise to all who seek it, and everyday, they are making the Internet a better place to be!...". More info about this award is available at our "Honors Granted" section.
2004-10-20, listed at W3 Compliant Sites
Carlos Simoes is now a "W3 Compliant Sites Member". W3 Compliant Sites is a collection of web sites that were created by designers that conform with the W3C standards. This forum provides the opportunity for them to display their work and ideas in a community that shares common interests.
2004-10-13, listed at net-guide.co.uk
The CPSnet Web Awards are now listed at net-guide.co.uk with an accessibility rating of "excellent". This directory aims to promote accessible sites and gives an accessibility rating for the websites returned for any query entered. Similarly, the directory entries also carry an accessibility rating.
2004-06-07, rated 5 by WebsAwards
A special panel of external judges, convened to assess the programs owned by WebsAwards' Staff members, has rated the CPSnet Web Awards as a WebsAwards level 5 program.
2004-05-04, rated 3 by Awardia
The Awardia Index has rated the CPSnet Web Awards as a level 3 (in 4 possible, where the fourth level is designated "Corona").
2004-04-01, rated 4 by EAI:
The Euro Award Index reinstated this award program at "Level 4" (in 5 possible).
2004-03-23, joined WSG:
We have joined the Web Standards Group (WSG). The Web Standards Group is for web developers/designers who are interested in web standards, CSS and (X)HTML and related topics.
2004-03-15, web site redesigned:
The CPSnet Web Awards have now a brand new website, fully compliant XHTML 1.0 Strict, "made with CSS" and WCAG-WAI Level AAA. Thank you to Webmates, of which we are proud members, for all the help and for the inspiration!
2004-01-15, announced the Best Site of Year 2003:
Announced back in 15/January 2004: "Explore Mars Now". In this outstanding website, visitors can walk through a Mars habitat simulation learning about science and technology as they explore. There are over 100 photo-realistic 3-D images of a near term Mars Habitat concept that are "brought to life" in Macromedia Flash.

CSS is not supported or is currently disabled. The page is still completely usable.

Disqualifying Factors and mandatory requirements

Created 2003-01-30. Reviewed 2005-04-25: Added clarifications and requisites for children' sites; Reworded the item in our Privacy Policy regarding "Children Privacy Protection".

If you wish to print this page for offline reading, you can load this page in a printer-friendly format. After printing, just hit refresh or reload the page in your browser and the standard stylesheet will be reload.

When assessing the web site's eligibility or during the review process, factors that will lead to immediate disqualification are described below (but are not limited to).

  1. Disqualifying factors in site's content;
  2. Disqualifying factors in site's design;
  3. Disqualifying privacy and safety issues;
  4. Disqualifying interaction practices.

I. When evaluating the site's content.

  1. The existence of any material (including text, videos, animations, images, etc.):
    1. that can be widely considered as offensive or rude, potentially disturbing and/or dangerous. Such material is allowed only if in educational, scientific and/or artistic context (as determined by our panel) and clearly noticed in the opening page. Content rating, by means of a PICS label, is mandatory in such case (1);
    2. that can be considered of strong sexual or erotic connotation, such as integral or partial nudes, description of sexual activities, either in words, sounds or images and similar or related material except when included in educational, scientific and/or artistic context as determined by our panel. Content rating, by means of a PICS label, is mandatory in such case (1);
    3. that incites or promotes abuse and violence against other human beings, animals and nature, including (but not limited to) hunting, bullfights;
    4. that promotes pedophilia and pornography/bestiality;
    5. that promotes any kind of sexual commerce, product or service, as well as adult-oriented commercial activities;
    6. that promotes online gambling;
    7. that promotes any illegal activities or incites to commit illegal activities;
    8. that promotes the use of drugs, tobacco or the abuse of alcohol; We will accept references to such products when in an educational or informative context.
    9. that contains written material, any image or any other representation of ideas or theories, which advocates, promotes or incites hatred, discrimination or violence, against any individual or group of individuals, based on race, colour, descent or national or ethnic origin, political affiliation, as well as religion if used as a pretext for any of these factors;
    10. that denies, grossly minimises, approves or justifies acts constituting genocide or crimes against humanity, as defined by international law and recognised as such by final and binding decisions of the International Military Tribunal, established by the London Agreement of 8 August 1945, or of any other international court established by relevant international instruments;
    11. that promotes personal or institutional discrimination of any other person, institution or organization;
    12. Links (including banners and other advertising material) to sites with content similar to the described in the items above, are considered as a promotion and therefore will imply immediate disqualification (2).
    13. The evidence of plagiarism, copyright violation, bandwidth stealing and failure to properly credit and acknowledge the source of all non-original material existing in the site;

II. When evaluating the site's design.

  1. The site will be disqualified if:
    1. it is anonymous, i.e. no information about the author can be found in the site;
    2. it is inactive, frozen or has not been updated for more than 3 months;
    3. it contains "under-construction" pages or sections;
    4. it has more than 2% of its links to images, buttons or banners' sources broken;
    5. it has more than 2% of its total number of links to other sites, including external resources (counters, guest books, etc.) broken;
    6. it shows any error due to missing stylesheets or java applets;
    7. it contains broken internal links (to pages located in the website);
    8. it opens a new window (with different content or not) when the current window is closed;
    9. attempts to place the current page as the browser's homepage; displays a pop-up window or message box asking for the inclusion in "Favorites";
    10. it opens external links in the site's own frame set;
  2. Also considered as disqualifying factors are:
    1. The existence of any kind of mouse trailer and/or the existence of any script modifying the user' standard mouse operation and look (for instance, changing the cursor shape, color and/or size).
    2. The non existence of a skip link in any splash page with Flash (or other) animations and/or movies.
    3. The loading time of the entrance page if it exceeds 90 seconds on a 56K connection;
    4. The non existence of a music/sound control when background music or sound effects are used in the site. This control may be as simple as an on/off control easily seen and readily available.

III. When assessing Privacy and Safety policies and issues.

  1. We will not consider eligible to be awarded one of our awards any website owned and/or operated by someone below the age of sixteen (16), whereas personally identifiable information about the owner / webmaster is present in the website. This provision is made having in mind the relevant legislation regarding children online privacy protection, namely COPPA and EU Directive 95/46;
  2. The non existence of a clear Privacy Policy that ensures the visitors' privacy and safety whenever personal information is collected in any of the site's activities (i.e. tests, surveys, inquiries, polls, etc.). It must be detailed how the site intends to use and display gathered information;
    1. The point above applies specially to sites targetted at children, or where age is collected to provide any kind of service. Read the requirements for children sites at our Children Online Privacy and Safety Policy.
  3. In any site selling products or services and accepting payments online, the non existence of a detailed information about the transaction, including shipping and delivery, refund policy, secure processing of the credit card details, etc. It must be clearly stated if the transaction is being done in a secure location or not.
  4. Whenever cookies are used in the site, this must be stated in the Privacy Policy, describing for what purpose are the cookies used and what is the content of the cookie. This applies also to cookies used by third-party resources;
  5. The existence of un-moderated chat rooms; sites with chat rooms are required to have strict and rigid safety and disclosure rules, as well as a prior registration leading to proper identification of the user before allowance to enter the chat room is granted. In case a moderated and supervised chat room is available from the site, a ICRA or similar labeling is mandatory;

IV. When assessing the site's interaction with the user.

  1. The imposition of signing a "guest book" or participating in an inquiry, survey and similar and checking the visitor's identity by using a (simulated or real) login prior to be granted the access to the main page and the denial of authorization if the visitor's explicitly refuses to do so;
  2. The site requests a pre-register. We will not review sites requesting a "user login", even if such login is provided. This includes web-based groups such as Yahoo or MSN groups, message boards and/or community forums;
  3. The site requests the participation in any voting for some kind of "Top List" (or similar) or to sign any "guest book", by means of a "pop-up" window or message box being displayed as soon as the visitor enters the site and the periodic request for the visitor's vote after the explicit refuse (by clicking a "cancel" button or closing the pop-up window) in participating;
  4. The existence of third-party advertising "pop-up" window(s) or message boxes (not related to the site's content) when entering the site and even if this is understood to be imposed by the ISP in exchange for the site's free hosting;

The existence of any of the items described above will cause the site's immediate and irreversible disqualification, without further notice.

(2) Whenever links to web sites with potentially disturbing and/or dangerous material, when included in educational, scientific and/or artistic context, are provided in the web site, a warning must be issued next to the link itself. Content providers who are aware that their sites is popular with children should state clearly on the home page if they think some of the material on their site, or linked from their site, is inappropriate for children.

Please note: You may find some sections of our Disqualifications similar to the requirements for APEX membership. There are two reasons for that: (a) This set was originally written by Carlos Paula Simões (since 2002 an APEX evaluator and currently a member of APEX's Board of Directors) and was adapted later to become current APEX review orientations; (b) We are strong supporters of APEX mission and we share the same idea of Ethics in the Web.

Personal information means individually identifiable information about an individual collected online, including:

  1. A first and last name;
  2. A home or other physical address including street name and name of a city or town;
  3. An e-mail address or other online contact information, including but not limited to an instant messaging user identifier, or a screen name that reveals an individual’s e-mail address;
  4. A telephone number;
  5. A Social Security number, a Fiscal identification number and/or a National Identitity Card number;
  6. A persistent identifier, such as a customer number held in a cookie or a processor serial number, where such identifier is associated with individually identifiable information;
  7. A combination of a last name or photograph of the individual with other information such that the combination permits physical or online contacting;
  8. Information concerning a child or the parents of that child that the operator collects online from a child and combines with an identifier described in this definition.