CPSnet Web Awards Program, awards for sites skies above.
- Check the latest winners:
- Ydeveloper, 2005-06
- Jazz in Azerbaijan, 2005-07
- afreeCodec, 2005-07
CSS is not supported or is currently disabled. The page is still completely usable.
General Criteria
If you wish to print this page for offline reading, you can load this page in a printer-friendly format. After printing, just hit refresh or reload the page in your browser and the standard stylesheet will be reloaded.
We ask our applicants to please select the award program to which the site is being submitted. This should be stated in the appropriate field in the Application form. It should be noticed also that we will not transfer applications between award programs nor will we award other than the applicant's choice, even if during the review process we conclude that the site complies with the minimum requirement for the other award program. The 90 days period applies also to applications from the same site and/or webmaster to any of the CPSnet Web Awards.
Our award programs intend to reward web sites that excel in two main and fundamental aspects of a web presence: Content and Design. The "High In The Sky Award" rewards excellence in content and the "Aracnofilia Web Design Award" seeks to reward outstanding and flawless web design.
We do not, however, exclude design considerations when reviewing a "High In The Sky" application, nor do we omit content quality when evaluating an "Aracnofilia Web Design" candidate. In each case, a minimum quality level either for Content or Design must be present.
- The High In The Sky Award:
- The site must be considered as a true knowledge source and a reference in its field, preferably dedicated to one single theme, its content being, most of it (more than 75%), original, informational, educational, scientific, presenting (or not) an entertainment component;
- The site must have at least twenty (20) pages, not including any existent "awards page", guestbooks, forums etc.; Excellent design, clever original graphics and artwork; Presented well and easy to access and navigate;
- We welcome sites with informational, educational, scientific and/or cultural content of great quality, presented in an original way, asking for the visitors' participation and providing these visitors access to an extensive and resourceful virtual library.
- The Aracnofilia Web Design Award:
- This award will be given to web sites that present an excellent overall balance of design, layout, well-optimized graphics, download time, friendly and functional navigation, browsers and platforms compatibility and overall professional appearance, originality and maintenance;
- The site must have at least fifteen (15) pages, not including any existent "awards page", guestbooks, forums etc;
- The site must be considered an example of excellent and innovative web design.
We require the site's language to be one of the following: English, Portuguese, French, Spanish. The number of languages accepted may increase in the future. For now, any site in any other language, but having a full translation to any of the above languages, will be considered eligible. It will not be considered as a "bilingual site" one having simple links to any on-line translation service, like the one provided by Altavista, for instance.
Scoring Scales and Limits
Web sites are classified according to two scales ranging from 1 to 5:
- One scale rates the site's content. Scores calculated by each of our content evaluators will be averaged;
- Other scale rates the web site design. Scores calculated by each of our design evaluators will be averaged.
For a website to be awarded one of our awards it must attain a certain classification in the evaluation process. Also it must equal or exceed the minimum value fixed for "Design", in the case of the "High In The Sky Award" or "Content" in the case of the "Aracnofilia Web Design Award".
- High In The Sky Award
- Content as per Content
Criteria and Scoring: minimum average 4.3;
- Restraints: No more than one item scored below 4 (item 14, "Additional points", excluded) and no single item scored below 3.
- Design: minimum average 4.6 as per Design
Criteria and Scoring or 4.4 if evaluated by the Flash
Criteria and Scoring;
- Restraints: no more than four items scored below 4 and no single item scored below 3.
- Content as per Content
Criteria and Scoring: minimum average 4.3;
- Aracnofilia Web Design Award
- Design: minimum average 4.6 as per Design
Criteria and Scoring or 4.4 if evaluated by the Flash
Criteria and Scoring;
- Restraints: No more than one item scored below 4 and no single item scored below 3.
- Content as per Content
Criteria and Scoring: minimum average 3.6;
- Restraints: No more than four single items scored below 4 and no single item scored below 3.
- Design: minimum average 4.6 as per Design
Criteria and Scoring or 4.4 if evaluated by the Flash
Criteria and Scoring;
Tools used for evaluation
The tools used for several of our assessments include (but are not limited to):
- Browsers: Internet Explorer 6, Netscape 7, Opera 7 and Mozilla Firefox 1.0, all running in Windows 98 and Windows XP;
- HTML validation: W3C HTML validator and/or WDG validator;
- CSS validation: W3C CSS validator;
- Accessibility Tests: WebXact and/or Cynthia Says and/or Bobby Online;
- Link Checking: Web Link Validator;
- Structure, Deprecated HTML, Metadata Information as well as Styles, Images and Scripts on/off: NILS Accessibility Toolbar for Internet Explorer and the Web Developer Toolbar for Mozilla, by Chris Pederick;
- Text-mode browsing: Lynx Viewer.



